1043 Civic Center Drive
Suite 200
Santa Ana, CA 92703


714-997-4400

Law Office of Ronald G. Brower Blog

 

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

SB 395 Impacts Juvenile Investigations

Sb 395
Last October, California Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 395: police cannot interrogate children 15 and under until a child has consulted with an attorney. Before, children of any age were allowed to waive their right to an attorney, even when parents had no idea their child was in custody. The legislation came about due to law enforcement officers exploiting young people’s ignorance regarding their rights.

As you might expect, SB 395 is hailed as a victory by defense attorneys, while law enforcement views it as something altogether different. As of January 1, 2018, police officers can no longer interrogate minors until suspects have consulted with an attorney, which law enforcement says will only make investigations more difficult, Bakersfield.com reports. The law "definitely complicates things," says Bakersfield Police Department spokesman, Sgt. Ryan Kroeker.

 

Understanding the Law


Defense attorney Kyle J. Humphrey points out that teenagers cannot grasp what can result from waiving their right to speak with an attorney before interrogation, according to the article. The bill highlights research indicating that young people tend to “either ignore or discount future outcomes and implications and disregard long-term consequences of important decisions." Humphrey says SB 395 is seriously past due.

"It may make it a little harder for law enforcement to do their job, but when you’re talking about someone’s freedom, or giving someone a 'scarlet letter,' it should be difficult to get a conviction," Humphrey said.

In Kern County, for instance, the Public Defender's office started a program to comply with SB 395, the article reports. A defense attorney is available 24 hours a day to consult with minors, either in person or via teleconference.

 

Criminal Defense Attorney


If your son or daughter is charged with a criminal offense, please contact the Law Office of Ronald G. Brower. Juvenile cases can have a severe impact on the course of a person’s life; Attorney Brower can help you achieve the best possible outcome.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by Ronald Brower at 0 Comments Links to this post

Wednesday, January 10, 2018

New U.S. Attorney Eastern California on Marijuana

legalization
Despite the fact that medical marijuana is legal in California since 1996, and as of January 1, 2018, adult recreational use is permitted, the U.S. Department of Justice is resistant. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has decided to change course from the previous administration which could result in a return to prosecuting people making a living in the billion-dollar industry.

Some of you may remember a memo sent out by President Barack Obama during his tenure? A statement issued directed prosecutors to take a “hands-off approach” regarding marijuana-related cases in states with legalized marijuana. Last week, AG Sessions voided president Obama’s memo, The Sacramento Bee reports. Sessions gave federal prosecutors the authority to pursue marijuana cases in states with legal weed, once again.

While it’s difficult to say what any of this will lead to at this point, some advocates are concerned that the order will cripple California’s new industry, one that is already off to a shaky start.

 

Marijuana’s Future in California


California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Lori Ajax of the Bureau of Cannabis Control, and Hezekiah Allen of the California Growers Association have all spoken out against Sessions' move last week, according to the article. Even though Becerra and Ajax have made encouraging statements in favor of legalization, Hezekiah Allen still has concerns that Sessions’ move could prompt some growers to stay in the black market.

The new U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of California has a history of going after people in the cannabis industry. President Donald Trump appointed to the Eastern District, McGregor Scott, who had previously served as an appointee of President George W. Bush. Before leaving office in 2009, Scott had a history of prosecuting people in California’s medical marijuana industry, including some high-profile cases. Scott’s re-appointment has some advocates reeling; it stands to reason that he may return to a similar approach.

Again, it’s still too early to tell what the Obama memo rescission will mean for California’s legal marijuana industry. After all, the voters have spoken, and the state’s AG has expressed his intention to uphold the will of the people. Sacramento cannabis consultant Jacqueline McGowan is optimistic:

“We are fortunate to live in a state where our attorney general has stated several times that he will respect the will of the voters and will defend compliant operators,” she said. “What the new era looks like will depend on us continuing to be a compliant and responsible industry. A memo being rescinded doesn’t change any of this.”

 

Criminal Defense Attorney


If you are facing charges for a cannabis-related crime in California, please contact Attorney Ronald G. Brower. With more than three decades of experience, he can provide you with a sound legal defense and ensure you find the best outcome possible.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Posted by Ronald Brower at 0 Comments Links to this post

Wednesday, January 3, 2018

Prop 57 Means Early Parole, For Some

Prop 57
In November 2016, voters in California opted to give some criminal offenders a second chance, voting in favor of Proposition 57. Individuals who’ve used their time behind bars wisely, i.e., good behavior and pursuing higher education, now have a better shot at achieving parole. Prop 57 is intended for nonviolent offenders, and by this law parole decisions no longer fall under the purview of prosecutors. The legislation aims to end the practice of prison ‘warehousing.’

Under the law, the state Board of Parole Hearings has more authority when it comes to determining which non-violent inmate may be eligible for parole, according to The San Diego Union-Tribune. Giving the parole board greater power is considered a good thing. However, there are still reasonable concerns about fast-tracking parole. After all, just because a crime is nonviolent, doesn’t mean it’s not heinous and should not call for punishment reflective of the severity of the act.

 

35 Years In Prison to Five


Proposition 57, approved by California voters in late 2016 was to reduce the state prison population and give nonviolent offenders an early second chance to mend their ways. One of the two men found guilty of a medical syringe scam could get out of prison in 5 years under the new law, the article reports. Five years in jail for a $3.3 million investment scam is likely to anger some and for good reasons. In November, a jury found Matthew Mazur guilty of 36 counts mainly tied to fraud and grand theft after duping those who invested in his companies SafeSnap syringe. The judge piled on one consequential sentence after another, totaling more than 35 years. Prop 57 could result in him serving only a seventh of his term.

“I personally will be arguing against it [early parole],” said Deputy District Attorney Hector Jimenez, who prosecuted Mazur and co-defendant Carlos Manjarrez. 

It will be interesting to see how Mazur’s sentence plays out, especially when you consider that Proposition 57 takes parole decisions out of the hands of prosecutors. We will continue to follow this story as it unfolds.

 

Criminal Defense Attorney


If you have been charged with a crime in California, please contact Attorney Ronald G. Brower. With more than three decades of experience, he can provide you with an effective legal defense and ensure you find the best outcome possible.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by Ronald Brower at 0 Comments Links to this post